D E M O C R A T O P I A

Deseo ofrecer una disculpa y clarificación con respecto al contenido disponible en este espacio. Es importante destacar que la naturaleza del material publicado en esta página no es original, sino que consiste en gran medida en resúmenes derivados de diversos manuales de estudio mejor o peor referenciados. Estos resúmenes varían en su grado de textualidad y en la calidad de las referencias académicas utilizadas, abarcando desde citas directas hasta interpretaciones más libres de los textos originales.

Además, es relevante mencionar que en algunos casos, estos resúmenes y contenidos son elaborados con el apoyo de herramientas de Inteligencia Artificial. Por tanto, me gustaría reiterar nuestras disculpas por cualquier confusión o malentendido que haya podido surgir debido a la falta de claridad respecto a la naturaleza y el origen del contenido en kibbutzpsicologia.com.

Neville Moray

Neville Moray (May 27, 1935 – 15 December 2017) was a British/Canadian academic and Professor at the Department of Psychology of the University of Surrey,known from his 1959 research of the cocktail party effect.

Moray became known for his scientific contributions to the cocktail party effect, which became his major research interest for about two decades. This effect concerns the phenomenon of being able to focus one’s auditory attention on a particular stimulus while filtering out a range of other stimuli. The effect was first defined and named «the cocktail party problem» by Colin Cherry in 1953. Cherry found that participants were able to detect their name from the unattended channel, the channel they were not shadowing.Moray build his research using Cherry’s shadowing task. He was able to conclude that almost none of the rejected messages were able to penetrate the block set up, except subjectively «important» messages.

Neville Moray used Cherry’s shadowed dichotic listening task in his 1959 research and was able to conclude that almost none of the rejected messages were able to penetrate the block set up, except subjectively «important» messages.Personal names, taboo language, and backward language are the «subjectively» important messages that have been found to date. Moray’s 1959 study found a 33% detection rate for personal names, which revealed that participants sometimes notice their name in an ignored auditory channel. This ability to selectively attend to one’s own name has been found in infants as young as five months of age and appears to be fully developed by thirteen months of age.

Rochelle S. Newman in a 2005 study found that five-month-old infants listened longer to their names when the target voice was 10 dB, but not 5 dB more intense than the background noise. Nine-month-olds also failed at 5 dB, but thirteen-month-olds succeeded. This success in recognizing one’s own name in the unattended channel can be explained using Cherry’s initial report on dichotic shadowing. Cherry found that the verbal content of the message in the unattended channel was completely blocked, so that the words were treated as merely sounds. This allows the subject to know that something has stimulated the ear whose message is rejected. It may be thought of as a general warning signal, that a sound has occurred to which the subject might need to respond.

 

Si considera que un término del glosario necesita ser corregido o ampliado, no dude en dejarnos un comentario. Además, tiene la posibilidad de sugerir la adición de nuevos términos para ser incluidos en el glosario. Valoramos enormemente sus aportes y sugerencias, ya que nos ayudan a mejorar y enriquecer continuamente este recurso. ¡Gracias por contribuir a la mejora de nuestro glosario!

Deja un comentario

veinte + cuatro =

Ir al contenido